苏格拉底：申辩
Socrate/苏格拉底
Men of Athens，this reputation of mine has come of a certain sort of wisdom which I possess. If you ask me what kind of wisdom，I reply，such wisdom as may perhaps be attained by every man，for to that extent I am inclined to believe that I am wise；whereas the persons of whom I was speaking have a superhuman wisdom，which I may fail to describe，because I have it not myself；and he who says that I have，speaks falsely，and is taking away my character. And here，O men of Athens，I must beg you not to interrupt me，even if I seem to say something extravagant. For the word which I will speak is not mine. I will refer you to a witness who is worthy of credit；that witness shall be the God of Delphi，he will tell you about my wisdom，if I have any，and of what sort it is.
You must have known Chaerephon；he was early a friend of mine，and also a friend of yours，for he shared in the recent exile of the people，and returned with you. Well，Chaerephon，as you know，was very impetuous in all his doings，and he went to Delphi and boldly asked the oracle to tell him whether，as I was saying，I must beg you not to interrupt，he asked the oracle to tell him whether any one was wiser than I was，and the Pythian prophetess answered，that there was no man wiser. Chaerephon is dead himself；but his brother，who is in court，will confirm the truth of what I’m saying.
Why do I mention this? Because I am going to explain to you why I have such an evil name. When I heard the answer，I said to myself，“What can the god mean? And what is the interpretation of his riddle? For I know that I have no wisdom，small or great. What then can he mean when he says that I am the wisest of men? And yet he is a god，and cannot lie；that would be against his nature. ”After long consideration，I thought of a method of trying the question. I reflected that if I could only find a man wiser than myself，then I might go to the god with a refutation in my hand. I should say to him，“Here is a man who is wiser than I am；but you said that I was the wisest.”Accordingly I went to one who had the reputation of wisdom，and observed him，his name I need not mention；he was a politician whom first among I selected for examination，and the result was as follows：When I began to talk with him，I could not help thinking that he was not really wise，although he was thought wise by many，and still wiser by himself；and thereupon I tried to explain to him that he thought himself wise，but was not really wise；and the consequence was that he hated me，and his enmity was shared by several who were present. So I left him，saying to myself，as I went away：Conceit of man，although I do not suppose that either of us knows anything really beautiful and good，I am better off than he is，for he knows nothing，and thinks that he knows；I neither know nor think that I know. In this latter particular，then，I seem to have slightly the advantage of him.
Then I went to another who had still higher pretensions to wisdom，and my conclusion was exactly the same，whereupon I made another enemy of him，and of many others besides him. Then I went to one man after another，being not unconscious of the enmity which I provoked，and I lamented and feared this：but necessity was laid upon me，the word of God，I thought，ought to be considered first. And I said to myself，I must go to all who appear to know，and find out the meaning of the oracle. And I swear to you，Athenians，by the dog I swear，for I must tell you the truth，the result of my mission was just this：I found that the men most in repute were all but the most foolish；and that others less esteemed were really wiser and better.
I will tell you the whole of my wanderings and of the“Herculean”labors，as I may call them，which I endured only to find at last the oracle irrefutable. After the politicians，I went to the poets，tragic，dithyrambic and all sorts. And there，I said to myself，you will be instantly detected；now you will find out that you are more ignorant than they are. Accordingly，I took them some of the most elaborate passages in their own writings，and asked what the meaning of them was，thinking that they would teach me something. Will you believe me? I am almost ashamed to confess the truth，but I must say that there is hardly a person present who would not have talked better about their poetry than they did themselves. Then I knew that not by wisdom do poets write poetry，but by a sort of genius and inspiration；they are like diviners or soothsayers who also say many fine things，but do not understand the meaning of them. The poets appeared to me to be much in the same case；and I further observed that upon the strength of their poetry they believed themselves to be the wisest of men in other things in which they were not wise. So I departed，conceiving myself to be superior to them for the same reason that I was superior to the politicians.